<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Request for Comments for Thunderbird&#8217;s FUEL equivalent, STEEL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:11:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: morissen3k8</title>
		<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/comment-page-1/#comment-60806</link>
		<dc:creator>morissen3k8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/#comment-60806</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t Thunderbird have it&#039;s own extension names just like word and excel does for their own documents?  This sure makes it easier for Thunderbird to distinguish if it&#039;s FF&#039;s or Thunderbirds i.e. .fxpi for FF or .txpi for Thunderbird?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t Thunderbird have it&#8217;s own extension names just like word and excel does for their own documents?  This sure makes it easier for Thunderbird to distinguish if it&#8217;s FF&#8217;s or Thunderbirds i.e. .fxpi for FF or .txpi for Thunderbird?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Strontsman</title>
		<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/comment-page-1/#comment-60327</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Strontsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/#comment-60327</guid>
		<description>The problem with Thunderbird add-ons for me is that they&#039;re too hard find and install. Thus, there are also too few.

Maybe Mozilla Add-ons could serve Thunder- / Sunbird extensions with a different MIME type than those for Firefox, so that some XPIs were automatically handled by Sun- / Thunderbird (making installation easier).
Another idea would be to bundle a a few lines of JS variables (essentially this would be a shorter form of the install.rdf) into every AMO page that tells the add-on installer whether this add-on is compatible to your version of your product.
This would also prevent unnecessary downloads from AMO as people would not even be able to try to install incompatible add-ons. (I find myself often downloading add-ons without reading what Firefox version it is compatible to.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Thunderbird add-ons for me is that they&#8217;re too hard find and install. Thus, there are also too few.</p>
<p>Maybe Mozilla Add-ons could serve Thunder- / Sunbird extensions with a different MIME type than those for Firefox, so that some XPIs were automatically handled by Sun- / Thunderbird (making installation easier).<br />
Another idea would be to bundle a a few lines of JS variables (essentially this would be a shorter form of the install.rdf) into every AMO page that tells the add-on installer whether this add-on is compatible to your version of your product.<br />
This would also prevent unnecessary downloads from AMO as people would not even be able to try to install incompatible add-ons. (I find myself often downloading add-ons without reading what Firefox version it is compatible to.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nul</title>
		<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/comment-page-1/#comment-60030</link>
		<dc:creator>nul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/#comment-60030</guid>
		<description>Bundling DOMi would help more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bundling DOMi would help more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndersH</title>
		<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/comment-page-1/#comment-60028</link>
		<dc:creator>AndersH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascher.ca/blog/2007/11/27/request-for-comments-for-thunderbirds-fuel-equivalent-steel/#comment-60028</guid>
		<description>You might also want to make it easier to install extensions in Thunderbird. In Firefox you just click a link and answer yes/okay a couple of times. But I not even sure how you do it in Thunderbird. If you just click the link, Firefox will probably try to load it and wont hand it off to Tunderbird. I think you have to save the xpi to the a folder and drag it to the extensions dialog in Tunderbird. Way to cumbersome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might also want to make it easier to install extensions in Thunderbird. In Firefox you just click a link and answer yes/okay a couple of times. But I not even sure how you do it in Thunderbird. If you just click the link, Firefox will probably try to load it and wont hand it off to Tunderbird. I think you have to save the xpi to the a folder and drag it to the extensions dialog in Tunderbird. Way to cumbersome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
