Comments on: Think Schools, Think Email? http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/04/07/think-schools-think-email/ Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:34:56 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Rahul Gaitonde http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/04/07/think-schools-think-email/comment-page-1/#comment-61049 Rahul Gaitonde Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:22:25 +0000 http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/04/07/think-schools-think-email/#comment-61049 David, loved your reference to the community hub model. It seems to make sense even from a basic economy of scale p.o.v. If you can (either as part of Think Schools or otherwise) outline a clear, scoped model of how this hub would look (for small, medium-sized and large neighborhoods), it'll make it easier to goad stakeholders into making specific commitments. I'm sure they do a lot of that over on the F'fox or Moz. Messaging teams :) Speaking of Moz. Messaging and "envisioning the future of email", an open forum on the lines of <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/06_32/b3996062.htm?chan=gl" rel="nofollow">IBM's Jams</a> might be a better idea (to begin with) than a face-to-face meeting, given that things are so amorphous at present. The M.M. team could identify broad ideas and needs, narrow the scope, and then consider an F2F. David, loved your reference to the community hub model. It seems to make sense even from a basic economy of scale p.o.v. If you can (either as part of Think Schools or otherwise) outline a clear, scoped model of how this hub would look (for small, medium-sized and large neighborhoods), it’ll make it easier to goad stakeholders into making specific commitments. I’m sure they do a lot of that over on the F’fox or Moz. Messaging teams :)

Speaking of Moz. Messaging and “envisioning the future of email”, an open forum on the lines of IBM’s Jams might be a better idea (to begin with) than a face-to-face meeting, given that things are so amorphous at present. The M.M. team could identify broad ideas and needs, narrow the scope, and then consider an F2F.

]]>