<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird is PC World&#8217;s 43rd best product in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/05/27/thunderbird-is-pc-worlds-43rd-best-product-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/05/27/thunderbird-is-pc-worlds-43rd-best-product-in-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:34:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Latchford</title>
		<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/05/27/thunderbird-is-pc-worlds-43rd-best-product-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-61319</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Latchford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/05/27/thunderbird-is-pc-worlds-43rd-best-product-in-2008/#comment-61319</guid>
		<description>Might want to email them telling them to remove the download link and sending them to the latest version instead :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to email them telling them to remove the download link and sending them to the latest version instead <img src='http://ascher.ca/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Guru</title>
		<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/05/27/thunderbird-is-pc-worlds-43rd-best-product-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-61315</link>
		<dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/05/27/thunderbird-is-pc-worlds-43rd-best-product-in-2008/#comment-61315</guid>
		<description>Very odd but a nice honour nonetheless. Just a bit puzzled as to why the review they are linking to is from nearly 3 1/2 years (January 2005) ago and is for Thunderbird 1.x. One would have thought they would have had a review for the current 2.0 or may be even 1.5?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very odd but a nice honour nonetheless. Just a bit puzzled as to why the review they are linking to is from nearly 3 1/2 years (January 2005) ago and is for Thunderbird 1.x. One would have thought they would have had a review for the current 2.0 or may be even 1.5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
