<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Mozilla&#8217;s scope?  What should it be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/06/19/whats-mozillas-scope-what-should-it-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/06/19/whats-mozillas-scope-what-should-it-be/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:34:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc Diethelm</title>
		<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/06/19/whats-mozillas-scope-what-should-it-be/comment-page-1/#comment-61400</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Diethelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/06/19/whats-mozillas-scope-what-should-it-be/#comment-61400</guid>
		<description>Well, you asked ;)

I think work on Mozilla_The_Platform should finally start to evolve in a less haphazard, more mapped out fashion. XUL should be spec&#039;ed and versioned and made truly usable (beyond Firefox). Fx development should not break XUL behaviour anymore. Mozilla developers should keep a public log/feed of breaking changes. XULRunner should become easy to configure for new projects.

Maybe Mozilla should even encourage a completely new project: an open source video codec.

thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you asked <img src='http://ascher.ca/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think work on Mozilla_The_Platform should finally start to evolve in a less haphazard, more mapped out fashion. XUL should be spec&#8217;ed and versioned and made truly usable (beyond Firefox). Fx development should not break XUL behaviour anymore. Mozilla developers should keep a public log/feed of breaking changes. XULRunner should become easy to configure for new projects.</p>
<p>Maybe Mozilla should even encourage a completely new project: an open source video codec.</p>
<p>thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harrison</title>
		<link>http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/06/19/whats-mozillas-scope-what-should-it-be/comment-page-1/#comment-61396</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascher.ca/blog/2008/06/19/whats-mozillas-scope-what-should-it-be/#comment-61396</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I think the web is open enough. I am inclined to think Mozilla has cracked the web browser market open enough already. While there are still lots of people using proprietary browsers, the presence of Firefox in the market (and to a lesser, but growing, extent, WebKit) has made an impact which is almost irreversible. 

Originally I was a little disappointed when I heard about Firefox 3, because I thought Firefox 2 was &quot;good enough&quot;, and I wanted to see more focus on other Mozilla products - specifically Thunderbird/Sunbird.

However, after seeing the almost ridiculous amount of improvement Firefox 3 has, I stand corrected - it is a fantastic piece of work and the time was clearly well spent. 

Of course, now it&#039;s out, I&#039;m defaulting back to my previous position, despite the fact I was almost criminally wrong to have it before - more focus on Thunderbird and Sunbird. 

At the moment there are very few strong contenders in the open groupware world. Almost everything has to tie back into Outlook and/or Exchange, otherwise you just can&#039;t use it. I&#039;ve been searching for OSS replacements and there&#039;s just nothing that compares to the &quot;simplicity&quot; of Exchange in terms of coming up with a great groupware solution that you can just plug in and have everyone use. 

Thunderbird/Sunbird are on their way to competing - I&#039;ve been following the nightly builds with great interest as the teams working on them appear to be really making great strides. 

This is a little rambly, so I guess I&#039;ll summarise - I think &quot;open standards&quot; aren&#039;t just important on the web, but also any other number of Internet-connected applications/services. I think an improved focus on Mozilla offerings in the groupware space - building on and enhancing standards like CalDAV, creating killer clients, etc - will be the Next Big Thing for open standards and accessibility. 

That&#039;d be my vote, anyway :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I think the web is open enough. I am inclined to think Mozilla has cracked the web browser market open enough already. While there are still lots of people using proprietary browsers, the presence of Firefox in the market (and to a lesser, but growing, extent, WebKit) has made an impact which is almost irreversible. </p>
<p>Originally I was a little disappointed when I heard about Firefox 3, because I thought Firefox 2 was &#8220;good enough&#8221;, and I wanted to see more focus on other Mozilla products &#8211; specifically Thunderbird/Sunbird.</p>
<p>However, after seeing the almost ridiculous amount of improvement Firefox 3 has, I stand corrected &#8211; it is a fantastic piece of work and the time was clearly well spent. </p>
<p>Of course, now it&#8217;s out, I&#8217;m defaulting back to my previous position, despite the fact I was almost criminally wrong to have it before &#8211; more focus on Thunderbird and Sunbird. </p>
<p>At the moment there are very few strong contenders in the open groupware world. Almost everything has to tie back into Outlook and/or Exchange, otherwise you just can&#8217;t use it. I&#8217;ve been searching for OSS replacements and there&#8217;s just nothing that compares to the &#8220;simplicity&#8221; of Exchange in terms of coming up with a great groupware solution that you can just plug in and have everyone use. </p>
<p>Thunderbird/Sunbird are on their way to competing &#8211; I&#8217;ve been following the nightly builds with great interest as the teams working on them appear to be really making great strides. </p>
<p>This is a little rambly, so I guess I&#8217;ll summarise &#8211; I think &#8220;open standards&#8221; aren&#8217;t just important on the web, but also any other number of Internet-connected applications/services. I think an improved focus on Mozilla offerings in the groupware space &#8211; building on and enhancing standards like CalDAV, creating killer clients, etc &#8211; will be the Next Big Thing for open standards and accessibility. </p>
<p>That&#8217;d be my vote, anyway <img src='http://ascher.ca/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
